Player Stats

Chad Bumphis College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,270
Receptions
159
Touchdowns
26

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonMississippi State1232375553.5
2010 Regular SeasonMississippi State1244634577.7
2011 PostseasonMississippi State131-3044.7
2011 Regular SeasonMississippi State1324342444.7
2012 PostseasonMississippi State13318076.3
2012 Regular SeasonMississippi State13559041276.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season

Mississippi State paired 634 primary output with 83.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 81.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Troy

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Mississippi State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

70.9

Efficiency

81.5

Usage

23.4

Consistency

45.9

Best Game by takeover score

Troy

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 18. Jackson State: 9. Auburn: 47. Troy: 180. South Alabama: 35. Kentucky: 104. Tennessee: 93. Middle Tennessee: 11. Alabama: 7. Texas A&M: 50. LSU: 140. Arkansas: 82. Ole Miss: 146

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 3 by 40. Jackson State: 1 by 60. Auburn: 3 by 100. Troy: 6 by 100. South Alabama: 2 by 100. Kentucky: 9 by 77. Tennessee: 7 by 88.6. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 73.3. Alabama: 1 by 46.7. Texas A&M: 4 by 83.3. LSU: 9 by 100. Arkansas: 6 by 91.1. Ole Miss: 6 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins70.1 · Games = 8 · -2.1 vs Losses
Losses72.2 · Games = 5 · +2.1 vs Wins