Usage Score
23
Player Dossier
2009-2012Iowa
Keenan Davis
WR • 6'3" • Cedar Rapids, IA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Keenan Davis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75
Consistency
72.3
Season Value
64.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Iowa
091010111112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Iowa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Keenan Davis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Iowa. Keenan Davis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Iowa paired 713 primary output with 85.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Iowa
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
51.9
Efficiency
75
Usage
23
Consistency
72.3
Best Game by takeover score
Nebraska
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 41. Iowa State: 75. Unknown: 54. Central Michigan: 88. Minnesota: 50. Michigan State: 65. Penn State: 83. Northwestern: 30. Indiana: 57. Purdue: 17. Nebraska: 11
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 5 by 54.7. Iowa State: 4 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 72. Central Michigan: 6 by 97.8. Minnesota: 6 by 55.6. Michigan State: 6 by 72.2. Penn State: 4 by 100. Northwestern: 3 by 66.7. Indiana: 5 by 76. Purdue: 2 by 56.7. Nebraska: 1 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Wins52 · n=3 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses51.6 · n=7 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half62.2 · n=6 · +22.6 vs Second Half
Second Half39.6 · n=5 · -22.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | vs Nebraska | L 7-13 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Purdue | L 24-27 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Indiana | L 21-24 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Northwestern | L 17-28 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 10/21 | vs Penn State | L 14-38 | — | 4 | 83 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Michigan State | W 19-16 | — | 6 | 65 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Minnesota | W 31-13 | — | 6 | 50 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Central Michigan | L 31-32 | — | 6 | 88 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Iowa State | L 6-9 | — | 4 | 75 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Northern Illinois | W 18-17 | — | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Iowa
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920102010201120112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Iowa | 55 | 85 | 10.6 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Iowa | 131 | 67.2 | 10.5 | 76 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Iowa | 131 | 67.2 | 10.5 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Iowa | 713 | 85.5 | 22.2 | 582 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Iowa | 713 | 85.5 | 22.2 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Iowa | 571 | 75 | 23 | -142 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
88
Primary metric
88 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#2
Northwestern
109
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Pittsburgh
129
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 86 efficiency score.
#4
Penn State
83
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arkansas State
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Iowa
713 primary output · 85.5 efficiency · 22.2 usage
66.2
#2
2011 Regular Season · Iowa
66.2
713 primary · 85.5 efficiency · 22.2 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Iowa
64.9
571 primary · 75 efficiency · 23 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.9453
George Washington · Cedar Rapids, IA
- Committed To
- Iowa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,470
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.