Player Stats

Denard Robinson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
10,601
Passing yards
6,152
Rushing yards
4,449
Touchdowns
91

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonMichigan12539188351733.9
2010 PostseasonMichigan1331325459287.8
2010 Regular SeasonMichigan133,9592,3161,6433087.8
2011 PostseasonMichigan1213011713277.2
2011 Regular SeasonMichigan123,0751,9581,1173477.2
2012 PostseasonMichigan111000100073.8
2012 Regular SeasonMichigan112,4851,3191,1661673.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason

Michigan paired 4,272 primary output with 71.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 68.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Air Force

Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Michigan

Games

11

Primary Metric / G

235

Efficiency

68.5

Usage

43

Consistency

70.6

Best Game by takeover score

Air Force

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. South Carolina: 100. Alabama: 227. Air Force: 426. Massachusetts: 397. Notre Dame: 228. Purdue: 340. Illinois: 287. Michigan State: 259. Nebraska: 101. Iowa: 98. Ohio State: 122

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Carolina: 24 by 35.9. Alabama: 36 by 50.7. Air Force: 45 by 77.3. Massachusetts: 34 by 87.5. Notre Dame: 50 by 42.5. Purdue: 40 by 75.7. Illinois: 22 by 90.9. Michigan State: 49 by 57.3. Nebraska: 21 by 60.6. Iowa: 13 by 75.4. Ohio State: 10 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins301.2 · Games = 6 · +145.6 vs Losses
Losses155.6 · Games = 5 · -145.6 vs Wins