Usage Score
31.6
Player Profile
Garrett Gilbert
QB • 6'4" • Austin, TX, USA
Dual-threat creatorVolume operator
Garrett Gilbert is a dual-threat creator with 31.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
64.4
Consistency
81.5
Season Value
69.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · SMU
09091011121213
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Texas
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · SMU
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Garrett Gilbert, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · SMU. Garrett Gilbert is a dual-threat creator with 31.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
SMU paired 3,795 primary output with 64.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 64.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas, SMU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · SMU
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
379.5
Efficiency
64.4
Usage
31.6
Consistency
81.5
Best Game by takeover score
South Florida
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 441. Unknown: 346. Texas A&M: 331. TCU: 237. Rutgers: 498. Memphis: 370. Temple: 635. Cincinnati: 417. UConn: 376. South Florida: 144
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 76 by 64. Unknown: 59 by 63.6. Texas A&M: 67 by 59.2. TCU: 54 by 42. Rutgers: 81 by 58.7. Memphis: 52 by 67.5. Temple: 61 by 88.6. Cincinnati: 54 by 68.1. UConn: 59 by 63.2. South Florida: 24 by 68.8
Split Comparison
Wins381.3 · n=4 · -3.6 vs Losses
Losses384.8 · n=5 · +3.6 vs Wins
First Half370.6 · n=5 · -17.8 vs Second Half
Second Half388.4 · n=5 · +17.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
88.6 vs Temple
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/24 | @ South Florida | W 16-6 | 19 | 23 | 138 | 82.6 | 0 | 1 | 68.8 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs UConn300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 38-21 | 33 | 52 | 353 | 63.5 | 4 | 0 | 63.2 | 7 | 23 | 3.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Cincinnati300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 25-28 | 38 | 47 | 403 | 80.9 | 2 | 0 | 68.1 | 7 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Temple300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 59-49 | 37 | 53 | 538 | 69.8 | 4 | 0 | 88.6 | 8 | 97 | 12.10 | 2 | 53 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Memphis300-yard game | W 34-29 | 27 | 43 | 321 | 62.8 | 2 | 1 | 67.5 | 9 | 49 | 5.40 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Rutgers300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 52-55 | 45 | 70 | 484 | 64.3 | 5 | 0 | 58.7 | 11 | 14 | 1.30 | 2 | 21 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ TCU | L 17-48 | 23 | 44 | 276 | 52.3 | 2 | 4 | 42 | 10 | -39 | -3.90 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Texas A&M300-yard game | L 13-42 | 37 | 62 | 310 | 59.7 | 1 | 1 | 59.2 | 5 | 21 | 4.20 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Unknown300-yard game | — | 35 | 48 | 317 | 72.9 | 1 | 0 | 63.6 | 11 | 29 | 2.60 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Texas Tech300-yard game · Dual-threat | L 23-41 | 41 | 62 | 388 | 66.1 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 14 | 53 | 3.80 | 1 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas
2009-2011
Opening stop
- 2
SMU
2012-2013
Final stop
Season Progression
2009200920102011201220122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Texas | 315 | 55 | 7.9 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Texas | 315 | 55 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Texas | 3,124 | 59.9 | 24.5 | 2,809 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas | 262 | 40.6 | 7.7 | -2,862 |
| 2012 Postseason | SMU | 3,278 | 55.1 | 23.2 | 3,016 |
| 2012 Regular Season | SMU | 3,278 | 55.1 | 23.2 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | SMU | 3,795 | 64.4 | 31.6 | 517 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Temple
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
635
Primary metric
635 total offense with 88.6 efficiency.
#2
Kansas State
365
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
365 total offense with 64.7 efficiency.
#3
Fresno State
310
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
310 total offense with 59.7 efficiency.
#4
Florida Atlantic
323
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
323 total offense with 78.6 efficiency.
#5
Southern Miss
343
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
343 total offense with 77.8 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · SMU
3,795 primary output · 64.4 efficiency · 31.6 usage
69.2
#2
2010 Regular Season · Texas
62.7
3,124 primary · 59.9 efficiency · 24.5 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · SMU
61
3,278 primary · 55.1 efficiency · 23.2 usage
Milestones
20
250+ passing yards
15
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
21
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.9918
Lake Travis · Austin, TX
- Committed To
- Texas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
10,774
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.