Usage Score
12
Player Dossier
2022-2025UTSA
Houston Thomas
TE • 6'5" • 245 lbs • College Station, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Houston Thomas reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
62.6
Consistency
61.4
Season Value
53.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · UTSA
222323242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Houston Thomas, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · UTSA. Houston Thomas reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
UTSA paired 470 primary output with 72.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 62.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
28.9
Efficiency
62.6
Usage
12
Consistency
61.4
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 22. Texas State: 36. Unknown: 26. Colorado State: 29. Temple: 30. Rice: 2. North Texas: 21. Tulane: 5. South Florida: 77. Charlotte: 54. East Carolina: 35. Army: 10
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 2 by 73.3. Texas State: 4 by 60. Unknown: 3 by 57.8. Colorado State: 1 by 100. Temple: 2 by 100. Rice: 1 by 13.3. North Texas: 2 by 70. Tulane: 1 by 33.3. South Florida: 7 by 73.3. Charlotte: 4 by 90. East Carolina: 5 by 46.7. Army: 2 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Wins25 · n=5 · -7.7 vs Losses
Losses32.7 · n=6 · +7.7 vs Wins
First Half24.2 · n=6 · -9.5 vs Second Half
Second Half33.7 · n=6 · +9.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Florida
Best efficiency game
100 vs Temple
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Army | L 24-27 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs East Carolina | W 58-24 | — | 5 | 35 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Charlotte | W 28-7 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 32 |
| Fri 11/7 | @ South Florida | L 23-55 | — | 7 | 77 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 25 |
| Thu 10/30 | vs Tulane | W 48-26 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ North Texas | L 17-55 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Rice | W 61-13 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Temple | L 21-27 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/21 | @ Colorado State | W 17-16 | — | 1 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Texas State | L 36-43 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Texas A&M | L 24-42 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202220232023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | UTSA | 101 | 68.5 | 6.4 | 101 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 101 | 68.5 | 6.4 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | UTSA | 470 | 72.3 | 11 | 369 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UTSA | 470 | 72.3 | 11 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UTSA | 347 | 62.6 | 12 | -123 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
132
Primary metric
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
East Carolina
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
77
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#4
Houston
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Florida Atlantic
24
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · UTSA
470 primary output · 72.3 efficiency · 11 usage
57
#2
2024 Regular Season · UTSA
57
470 primary · 72.3 efficiency · 11 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · UTSA
53.4
347 primary · 62.6 efficiency · 12 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8422
College Station · College Station, TX
- Committed To
- UTSA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
918
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.