Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Boston College paired 3,383 primary output with 61.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | UCF | 5 | 195 | 75 | 120 | 1 | 25.8 |
| 2023 Postseason | Boston College | 13 | 258 | 102 | 156 | 2 | 82.8 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Boston College | 13 | 3,125 | 2,168 | 957 | 26 | 82.8 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Boston College | 8 | 1,560 | 1,366 | 194 | 19 | 62.2 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Florida State | 12 | 3,317 | 2,760 | 557 | 24 | 81.1 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Boston College paired 3,383 primary output with 61.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across UCF, Boston College, Florida State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
276.4
Efficiency
66.7
Usage
28.7
Consistency
96
Best Game by takeover score
Florida
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 230. East Texas A&M: 244. Kent State: 259. Virginia: 332. Miami: 329. Pittsburgh: 257. Stanford: 275. Wake Forest: 280. Clemson: 281. Virginia Tech: 234. NC State: 279. Florida: 317
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 30 by 75.9. East Texas A&M: 15 by 72.6. Kent State: 20 by 80.8. Virginia: 46 by 63.3. Miami: 61 by 55.9. Pittsburgh: 31 by 68.3. Stanford: 42 by 61.4. Wake Forest: 26 by 71. Clemson: 54 by 55.2. Virginia Tech: 31 by 70. NC State: 43 by 61.7. Florida: 47 by 64.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.