Player Stats

Leroy Banks College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
462
Receptions
34
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss3587154.8
2009 PostseasonSouthern Miss10213077.9
2009 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss1027362377.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

Southern Miss paired 375 primary output with 82.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 82.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Virginia

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 80th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · Southern Miss

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

37.5

Efficiency

82.4

Usage

15

Consistency

79.5

Best Game by takeover score

Virginia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 13. Alcorn State: 40. UCF: 42. Virginia: 43. Kansas: 53. Louisville: 53. Tulane: 27. Houston: 40. Tulsa: 26. East Carolina: 38

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 43.3. Alcorn State: 2 by 100. UCF: 4 by 70. Virginia: 3 by 95.6. Kansas: 4 by 88.3. Louisville: 3 by 100. Tulane: 1 by 100. Houston: 3 by 88.9. Tulsa: 2 by 86.7. East Carolina: 5 by 50.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins35.6 · Games = 5 · -3.8 vs Losses
Losses39.4 · Games = 5 · +3.8 vs Wins