Usage Score
7.8
Player Dossier
2022-2025Wisconsin
Tyrell Henry
WR • 6'0" • 178 lbs • Roseville, MI, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Tyrell Henry reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
50
Consistency
10
Season Value
20.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Michigan State
22232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Michigan State • Wisconsin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyrell Henry, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Michigan State. Tyrell Henry reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Tyrell Henry played WR for Michigan State and Wisconsin. Across 4 tracked seasons, Tyrell Henry recorded 23 rushing yards, 234 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Michigan State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 50 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan State, Wisconsin.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Wisconsin
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
2.9
Efficiency
50
Usage
7.8
Consistency
10
Best Game by takeover score
Minnesota
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 10. Middle Tennessee: -2. Alabama: 0. Maryland: 5. Michigan: 0. Iowa: 16. Washington: 0. Indiana: 0. Illinois: 0. Minnesota: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 1 by 66.7. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 0. Maryland: 1 by 33.3. Iowa: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins2 · Games = 4 · -1.5 vs Losses
Losses3.5 · Games = 6 · +1.5 vs Wins
First Half2.6 · Games = 5 · -0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half3.2 · Games = 5 · +0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Iowa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ Minnesota | L 7-17 | — | — | — | -3 | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/23 | vs Illinois | W 27-10 | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Indiana | L 7-31 | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Washington | W 13-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Iowa | L 0-37 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Michigan | L 10-24 | — | — | — | 5 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Maryland | L 10-27 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Alabama | L 14-38 | — | — | — | 4 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 42-10 | — | 2 | -2 | 0.3 | -1 | 1 | 3 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Miami (OH) | W 17-0 | — | 1 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Wisconsin
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2022202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Michigan State | 193 | 49.7 | 12.2 | 193 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 12 | 80 | 4.8 | -181 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 29 | 50 | 7.8 | 17 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Nebraska
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
54
Primary metric
54 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#2
Iowa
16
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Purdue
12
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Maryland
33
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
25
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Michigan State
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2023 Regular Season · Michigan State
51.1
193 primary · 49.7 efficiency · 12.2 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Wisconsin
35.2
12 primary · 80 efficiency · 4.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.83
Clay-Chalkville · Birmingham, AL
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
234
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 30 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.