Player Stats

Jayden Gibson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
387
Receptions
15
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonOklahoma1112051.7
2023 PostseasonOklahoma913069.6
2023 Regular SeasonOklahoma913372569.6
2024 Regular SeasonOklahoma0-00-
2025 Regular SeasonOklahoma0-00-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Oklahoma paired 375 primary output with 91.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 91.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: BYU

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Oklahoma

Games

9

Receiving Yards / G

41.7

Efficiency

91.1

Usage

6.4

Consistency

65.9

Best Game by takeover score

BYU

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 3. Arkansas State: 54. Tulsa: 34. Cincinnati: 21. Iowa State: 50. UCF: 17. West Virginia: 38. BYU: 82. TCU: 76

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 1 by 20. Arkansas State: 2 by 100. Tulsa: 1 by 100. Cincinnati: 1 by 100. Iowa State: 2 by 100. UCF: 1 by 100. West Virginia: 2 by 100. BYU: 2 by 100. TCU: 2 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins46.5 · Games = 8 · +43.5 vs Losses
Losses3 · Games = 1 · -43.5 vs Wins