Player Stats

Jasaiah Gathings College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,308
Receptions
124
Touchdowns
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonAkron0-00-
2022 Regular SeasonAkron1116054.9
2023 Regular SeasonAkron1255575174.7
2024 PostseasonUConn12322056.2
2024 Regular SeasonUConn1229285356.2
2025 Regular SeasonBuffalo1136410363.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Akron paired 575 primary output with 63.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 67.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Akron, UConn, Buffalo.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Buffalo

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

37.3

Efficiency

67.7

Usage

16.7

Consistency

59.1

Best Game by takeover score

Central Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 21. St. Francis (PA): 9. Kent State: 30. Troy: 47. Eastern Michigan: 43. Massachusetts: 84. Akron: 30. Bowling Green: 10. Central Michigan: 85. Miami (OH): 21. Ohio: 30

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 3 by 46.7. St. Francis (PA): 2 by 30. Kent State: 4 by 50. Troy: 2 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 100. Massachusetts: 6 by 93.3. Akron: 4 by 50. Bowling Green: 2 by 33.3. Central Michigan: 6 by 94.4. Miami (OH): 3 by 46.7. Ohio: 2 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins35.2 · Games = 5 · -3.8 vs Losses
Losses39 · Games = 6 · +3.8 vs Wins