Player Stats

Jordan Riley College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
206
TFL
8
Sacks
2
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
23

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonBall State49-0--040.8
2022 Regular SeasonBall State129431-12064.4
2023 Regular SeasonBall State126130-8053.1
2024 PostseasonKansas State131-0--026.1
2024 Regular SeasonKansas State13412113026.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Ball State paired 16 primary output with 45.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 18.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ball State, Kansas State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Houston

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Kansas State

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

0.5

Efficiency

18.8

Usage

3.8

Consistency

10.3

Best Game by takeover score

Houston

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Rutgers: 0. UT Martin: 0. Tulane: 2. Arizona: 1. BYU: 0. Oklahoma State: 2. Colorado: 0. West Virginia: 0. Kansas: 0. Houston: 2. Arizona State: 0. Cincinnati: 0. Iowa State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rutgers: 1 by 4.2. UT Martin: 3 by 12.5. Tulane: 8 by 53.3. Arizona: 1 by 14.2. BYU: 2 by 8.3. Oklahoma State: 6 by 45. Colorado: 3 by 12.5. West Virginia: 5 by 20.8. Kansas: 4 by 16.7. Houston: 5 by 40.8. Arizona State: 2 by 8.3. Cincinnati: 1 by 4.2. Iowa State: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.6 · Games = 9 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 4 · -0.1 vs Wins