Usage Score
10.2
Player Dossier
2021-2025Texas A&M
DE • 6'2" • 248 lbs • Kansas City, MO, USA
Cashius Howell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.6 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.2
Efficiency
37.6
Consistency
59.6
Season Value
51.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cashius Howell, DE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M. Cashius Howell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37.6 disruption score.
Cashius Howell played DE for Bowling Green and Texas A&M. Across 5 tracked seasons, Cashius Howell recorded 125 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 38.5 primary output with 37.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 37.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Bowling Green, Texas A&M.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
3.0
Efficiency
37.6
Usage
10.2
Consistency
59.6
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 0. UTSA: 0. Utah State: 6. Notre Dame: 2. Auburn: 2. Mississippi State: 7. Florida: 5. Arkansas: 3. LSU: 4. Missouri: 3. South Carolina: 5. Samford: 0.5. Texas: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 2 by 8.3. UTSA: 1 by 4.2. Utah State: 4 by 66.7. Notre Dame: 3 by 32.5. Auburn: 2 by 28.3. Mississippi State: 3 by 62.5. Florida: 1 by 54.2. Arkansas: 1 by 34.2. LSU: 2 by 48.3. Missouri: 5 by 50.8. South Carolina: 4 by 66.7. Samford: 1 by 9.2. Texas: 3 by 22.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Miami | L 3-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Texas | L 17-27 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Samford | W 48-0 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South CarolinaSplash game | W 31-30 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ MissouriSplash game | W 38-17 | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSU2+ sacks · Splash game | W 49-25 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ ArkansasSplash game | W 45-42 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs FloridaSplash game | W 34-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Mississippi State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 31-9 | 3 | 3 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs AuburnSplash game | W 16-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre DameSplash game | W 41-40 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Utah State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 44-22 | 4 | 4 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA | W 42-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Bowling Green
2021-2023
Opening stop
Texas A&M
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | 12.5 | 2.3 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 6.5 | 16.5 | 4.8 | 6.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Bowling Green | 26 | 31 | 11.2 | 19.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 26 | 31 | 11.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas A&M | 28.5 | 33.2 | 10.4 | 2.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 28.5 | 33.2 | 10.4 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 38.5 | 37.6 | 10.2 | 10 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 38.5 | 37.6 | 10.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 62.1 takeover score.
#2
Akron
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 59.9 takeover score.
#3
Mississippi State
7
Primary metric
Win with 7 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
7 disruption/tackle impact with 58.5 takeover score.
#4
Mississippi State
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.8 takeover score.
#5
Utah State
6
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 56.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
38.5 primary output · 37.6 efficiency · 10.2 usage
51.9
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
51.9
38.5 primary · 37.6 efficiency · 10.2 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Texas A&M
44.5
28.5 primary · 33.2 efficiency · 10.4 usage
1
Impact games
26
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8141
Rockhurst · Kansas City, MO
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
125
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 49 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.