Player Stats

Andreas Paaske College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
291
Receptions
20
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan0-00-
2022 PostseasonEastern Michigan816066.4
2022 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan89200266.4
2023 Regular SeasonEastern Michigan3439043.3
2024 Regular SeasonArkansas1319248.7
2025 Regular SeasonArkansas3327140.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

Eastern Michigan paired 206 primary output with 81.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 60 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Eastern Michigan, Arkansas.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Arkansas

Games

3

Receiving Yards / G

9

Efficiency

60

Usage

4.9

Consistency

71.3

Best Game by takeover score

Arkansas State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alabama A&M: 5. Arkansas State: 14. Notre Dame: 8

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama A&M: 1 by 33.3. Arkansas State: 1 by 93.3. Notre Dame: 1 by 53.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins9.5 · Games = 2 · +1.5 vs Losses
Losses8 · Games = 1 · -1.5 vs Wins