Usage Score
8.7
Player Dossier
2021-2025Rutgers
Colin Weber
TE • 6'4" • 258 lbs • Hopkins, MI, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Colin Weber reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
39.9
Consistency
61.6
Season Value
34.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Charlotte
2122232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Charlotte • Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Colin Weber, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Charlotte. Colin Weber reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Colin Weber played TE for Charlotte and Rutgers. Across 5 tracked seasons, Colin Weber recorded 675 receiving yards and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Charlotte.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Charlotte paired 362 primary output with 55.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 39.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Charlotte, Rutgers.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Rutgers
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
11.3
Efficiency
39.9
Usage
8.7
Consistency
61.6
Best Game by takeover score
Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 7. Miami (OH): 8. Unknown: 17. Iowa: 11. Minnesota: 3. Washington: 27. Oregon: 0. Purdue: 13. Illinois: 16
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 1 by 46.7. Miami (OH): 2 by 26.7. Unknown: 2 by 56.7. Iowa: 2 by 36.7. Minnesota: 1 by 20. Washington: 5 by 36. Purdue: 2 by 43.3. Illinois: 2 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins9.3 · Games = 3 · -2.1 vs Losses
Losses11.4 · Games = 5 · +2.1 vs Wins
First Half9.2 · Games = 5 · -4.8 vs Second Half
Second Half14 · Games = 4 · +4.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Washington
Best efficiency game
56.7 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/1 | @ Illinois | L 13-35 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Purdue | W 27-24 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Oregon | L 10-56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Washington | L 19-38 | — | 5 | 27 | 5.4 | 5.40 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Minnesota | L 28-31 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Iowa | L 28-38 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Miami (OH) | W 45-17 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Thu 8/28 | vs Ohio | W 34-31 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Charlotte
2021-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Rutgers
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20212022202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Charlotte | -2 | 0 | 6.7 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Charlotte | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Charlotte | 362 | 55.8 | 18.5 | 362 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Charlotte | 213 | 64.5 | 16.3 | -149 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Rutgers | 102 | 39.9 | 8.7 | -111 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
117
Primary metric
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
63
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 84 efficiency score.
#3
Florida
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#4
Navy
28
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Washington
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 36 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Charlotte
362 primary output · 55.8 efficiency · 18.5 usage
54.8
#2
2024 Regular Season · Charlotte
50.7
213 primary · 64.5 efficiency · 16.3 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Rutgers
34.6
102 primary · 39.9 efficiency · 8.7 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8093
Hopkins · Hopkins, MI
- Committed To
- Charlotte
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
675
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.