Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Marshall paired 18 primary output with 41.4 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 1 | 4 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 46.4 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 9 | 23 | - | 0 | - | 1 | 0 | 9.4 |
| 2023 Postseason | Eastern Michigan | 13 | 3 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 18.3 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 13 | 41 | 1 | 0 | - | 2 | 0 | 18.3 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Marshall | 11 | 66 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 69.9 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Marshall paired 18 primary output with 41.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 41.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Eastern Michigan, Marshall.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
41.4
Usage
9.2
Consistency
61.8
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 1. Missouri State: 2.5. Eastern Kentucky: 2. Middle Tennessee: 4. Louisiana: 2.5. Old Dominion: 2. Texas State: 2. James Madison: 1. Georgia State: 1. App State: 0. Georgia Southern: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 7 by 39.2. Missouri State: 5 by 45.8. Eastern Kentucky: 3 by 32.5. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 56.7. Louisiana: 5 by 45.8. Old Dominion: 6 by 45. Texas State: 7 by 49.2. James Madison: 6 by 35. Georgia State: 4 by 26.7. App State: 10 by 41.7. Georgia Southern: 9 by 37.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.