Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Kennesaw State paired 682 primary output with 81.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2022 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 2 | 6 | 71 | 0 | 50.9 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Kennesaw State | 8 | 15 | 220 | 2 | 49.7 |
| 2025 Postseason | Kennesaw State | 13 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 78.7 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Kennesaw State | 13 | 42 | 670 | 3 | 78.7 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Kennesaw State paired 682 primary output with 81.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Virginia Tech, Kennesaw State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
52.5
Efficiency
81.7
Usage
18.9
Consistency
69.8
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 12. Indiana: 54. Merrimack: 68. Arkansas State: 84. Middle Tennessee: 0. Louisiana Tech: 66. Florida International: 93. UTEP: 6. New Mexico State: 12. Jacksonville State: 72. Missouri State: 68. Liberty: 72. Jacksonville State: 75
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 2 by 40. Indiana: 5 by 72. Merrimack: 6 by 75.6. Arkansas State: 6 by 93.3. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 100. Florida International: 2 by 100. UTEP: 2 by 20. New Mexico State: 1 by 80. Jacksonville State: 4 by 100. Missouri State: 4 by 100. Liberty: 3 by 100. Jacksonville State: 5 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.