Player Stats

Jase Bauer College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
3,499
Passing yards
2,626
Rushing yards
873
Touchdowns
29

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan6747435312549.6
2023 Regular SeasonCentral Michigan122,2471,8813662276.2
2024 Regular SeasonSam Houston7505310195244.6
2025 Regular SeasonUT Martin3000032

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Central Michigan paired 2,247 primary output with 61.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 52.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Central Michigan, Sam Houston, UT Martin.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTEP

Game with 273 yards of offense and 59.7 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · UT Martin

Games

3

Primary Metric / G

164.7

Efficiency

52.7

Usage

0.5

Consistency

52

Best Game by takeover score

UTEP

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 107. UTEP: 273. Missouri State: 114

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 27 by 50.3. UTEP: 45 by 59.7. Missouri State: 34 by 48.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half190 · Games = 2 · +76 vs Second Half
Second Half114 · Games = 1 · -76 vs First Half