Player Dossier

2022-2025

Boston College

Jeremiah Franklin

TE • 6'3" • 244 lbs • Walkersville, MD, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Jeremiah Franklin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

16

Efficiency

72.5

Consistency

72.9

Season Value

65.1

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Boston College

2223242425

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
5
Program Path
Boston College
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia Tech

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Jeremiah Franklin, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Boston College. Jeremiah Franklin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Jeremiah Franklin played TE for Boston College. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jeremiah Franklin recorded 993 receiving yards, 3 tackles, and 6 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Boston College.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

Boston College paired 489 primary output with 72.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 72.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Boston College

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

40.8

Efficiency

72.5

Usage

16

Consistency

72.9

Best Game by takeover score

Syracuse

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 50. Michigan State: 84. Stanford: 41. California: 14. Pittsburgh: 35. Clemson: 16. UConn: 26. Louisville: 55. Notre Dame: 46. SMU: 18. Georgia Tech: 58. Syracuse: 46

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 5 by 66.7. Michigan State: 8 by 70. Stanford: 6 by 45.6. California: 1 by 93.3. Pittsburgh: 2 by 100. Clemson: 2 by 53.3. UConn: 2 by 86.7. Louisville: 5 by 73.3. Notre Dame: 7 by 43.8. SMU: 3 by 40. Georgia Tech: 4 by 96.7. Syracuse: 3 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Losses39.3 · Games = 10
First Half40 · Games = 6 · -1.5 vs Second Half
Second Half41.5 · Games = 6 · +1.5 vs First Half
All Games40.8 · Games = 12

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Michigan State

Best efficiency game

100 vs Syracuse

Result
Sat 11/29@ SyracuseW 34-1234615.315.30025
Sat 11/15vs Georgia TechL 34-3645814.514.50030
Sat 11/8vs SMUL 13-453186607
Sat 11/1vs Notre DameL 10-257466.66.6008
Sat 10/25@ LouisvilleL 24-385551111121
Sat 10/18vs UConnL 23-382261313016
Sat 10/11vs ClemsonL 10-412168808
Sat 10/4@ PittsburghL 7-4823517.517.50032
Sat 9/27vs CaliforniaL 24-281141414014
Sun 9/14@ StanfordL 20-306416.86.80013
Sat 9/6@ Michigan StateHigh volumeL 40-4288410.510.50118
Sat 8/30vs Unknown5501010021

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Boston College

    2022-2025

    Opening stop

Season Progression

20222023202420242025
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2022 Regular SeasonBoston College2739.27.4
2023 Regular SeasonBoston College166809.4139
2024 PostseasonBoston College31173.313.9145
2024 Regular SeasonBoston College31173.313.90
2025 Regular SeasonBoston College48972.516178

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Virginia Tech

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

52

Primary metric

52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Virginia Tech

49

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Pittsburgh

53

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Michigan State

84

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

84 receiving yards with a 70 efficiency score.

#5

Nebraska

56

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

56 receiving yards with a 62.2 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2025 Regular Season · Boston College

489 primary output · 72.5 efficiency · 16 usage

65.1

#2

2024 Postseason · Boston College

49.7

311 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 13.9 usage

#3

2024 Regular Season · Boston College

49.7

311 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 13.9 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

1

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2026 · Rating 0.83

Cherry Creek · Englewood, CO

Committed To
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2026

Career Facts

1

Career teams

5

Seasons tracked

993

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 35 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.