Player Stats

Hahsaun Wilson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,195
Rushing yards
1,110
Receiving yards
85
Touchdowns
11

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonCharlotte2440023.7
2023 Regular SeasonCharlotte33243222364.6
2024 Regular SeasonCharlotte1260155942760.3
2025 Regular SeasonUTEP1026622541134.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Charlotte paired 324 primary output with 56 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 35.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Charlotte, UTEP.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UT Martin

Win with 117 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · UTEP

Games

10

Scrimmage Yards / G

26.6

Efficiency

35.5

Usage

11.5

Consistency

25.2

Best Game by takeover score

UT Martin

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 2. UT Martin: 117. Texas: 39. UL Monroe: 45. Louisiana Tech: 34. Liberty: 10. Kennesaw State: 2. Jacksonville State: 1. New Mexico State: 9. Delaware: 7

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 1 by 16.7. UT Martin: 8 by 100. Texas: 6 by 67.7. UL Monroe: 11 by 30.2. Louisiana Tech: 9 by 40.7. Liberty: 10 by 6.5. Kennesaw State: 2 by 10.4. Jacksonville State: 1 by 10.4. New Mexico State: 2 by 46.9. Delaware: 3 by 25.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins117 · Games = 1 · +100.4 vs Losses
Losses16.6 · Games = 9 · -100.4 vs Wins