Usage Score
18.3
Player Dossier
2021-2025Central Michigan
DL • 6'4" • 260 lbs • Romeo, MI, USA
Michael Heldman shows a high-volume tackler profile with 42.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
18.3
Efficiency
42.7
Consistency
58.2
Season Value
54.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Central Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Michael Heldman, DL. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Central Michigan. Michael Heldman shows a high-volume tackler profile with 42.7 disruption score.
Michael Heldman played DL for Central Michigan. Across 5 tracked seasons, Michael Heldman recorded 119 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Central Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 40 primary output with 42.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 42.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
3.1
Efficiency
42.7
Usage
18.3
Consistency
58.2
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 0.5. San José State: 2. Pittsburgh: 0. Michigan: 1. Wagner: 4. Eastern Michigan: 4. Akron: 1. Bowling Green: 4. Massachusetts: 6. Western Michigan: 0. Buffalo: 8. Kent State: 5.5. Toledo: 4
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 1 by 9.2. San José State: 6 by 45. Pittsburgh: 1 by 4.2. Michigan: 1 by 14.2. Wagner: 5 by 60.8. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 60.8. Akron: 5 by 30.8. Bowling Green: 5 by 60.8. Massachusetts: 1 by 54.2. Western Michigan: 6 by 25. Buffalo: 4 by 66.7. Kent State: 5 by 70.8. Toledo: 3 by 52.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
70.8 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/26 | @ Northwestern | L 7-34 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | vs ToledoSplash game | L 3-21 | 3 | 3 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/20 | @ Kent State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 28-16 | 5 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/13 | vs Buffalo2+ sacks · Splash game | W 38-19 | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Western Michigan | L 21-24 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs MassachusettsSplash game | W 38-13 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Bowling Green2+ sacks · Splash game | W 27-6 | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Akron | L 22-28 | 5 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Eastern MichiganSplash game | W 24-13 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Wagner2+ sacks · Splash game | W 49-10 | 5 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Michigan | L 3-63 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Pittsburgh | L 17-45 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | @ San José StateSplash game | W 16-14 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Central Michigan
2021-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 10.5 | 17.1 | 5 | 10.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 16.5 | 24.4 | 9.5 | 6 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 18 | 25.1 | 7.4 | 1.5 |
| 2025 Postseason | Central Michigan | 40 | 42.7 | 18.3 | 22 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 40 | 42.7 | 18.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Bucknell
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.6 takeover score.
#2
Buffalo
8
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
8 disruption/tackle impact with 62.3 takeover score.
#3
Miami (OH)
4
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.5 takeover score.
#4
Akron
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56.1 takeover score.
#5
New Hampshire
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 53.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Central Michigan
40 primary output · 42.7 efficiency · 18.3 usage
54.8
#2
2025 Regular Season · Central Michigan
54.8
40 primary · 42.7 efficiency · 18.3 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Central Michigan
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
2
Impact games
18
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8119
Romeo · Romeo, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
119
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 49 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.