Player Stats

Bryce Bohanon College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
732
Receptions
55
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonTulane2112037.2
2022 Regular SeasonTulane3465038.9
2023 PostseasonTulane6-0051.1
2023 Regular SeasonTulane69117051.1
2024 PostseasonTulane10-0038.8
2024 Regular SeasonTulane1010121038.8
2025 Regular SeasonTulane1031417273.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

Tulane paired 417 primary output with 71.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 71.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Memphis

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Tulane

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

41.7

Efficiency

71.1

Usage

17.9

Consistency

64.6

Best Game by takeover score

Memphis

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 3. South Alabama: 62. Duke: 25. Ole Miss: 28. Tulsa: 42. East Carolina: 45. Army: 51. UTSA: 4. Memphis: 101. Florida Atlantic: 56

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 1 by 20. South Alabama: 5 by 82.7. Duke: 2 by 83.3. Ole Miss: 3 by 62.2. Tulsa: 3 by 93.3. East Carolina: 4 by 75. Army: 5 by 68. UTSA: 1 by 26.7. Memphis: 4 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins48.1 · Games = 8 · +32.1 vs Losses
Losses16 · Games = 2 · -32.1 vs Wins