Player Stats

Beau Atkinson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
65
TFL
19
Sacks
12
QB hurries
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina00-0--0-
2023 PostseasonNorth Carolina100-01-043.7
2023 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina10194.53.52-043.7
2024 PostseasonNorth Carolina12611--059.7
2024 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina1229116.54-059.7
2025 Regular SeasonOhio State9112.512-019.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

North Carolina paired 23.5 primary output with 28 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 11.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across North Carolina, Ohio State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ohio

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Ohio State

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

11.2

Usage

3.2

Consistency

14.8

Best Game by takeover score

Ohio

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas: 0. Grambling: 1. Ohio: 3. Washington: 1. Minnesota: 0.5. Illinois: 0. Wisconsin: 0. UCLA: 0. Rutgers: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 2 by 8.3. Grambling: 0 by 10. Ohio: 2 by 38.3. Washington: 1 by 14.2. Minnesota: 2 by 13.3. Illinois: 1 by 4.2. Wisconsin: 1 by 4.2. UCLA: 1 by 4.2. Rutgers: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half1.1 · Games = 5 · +1.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 4 · -1.1 vs First Half