Usage Score
6.6
Player Dossier
2022-2025Texas Tech
DL • 6'3" • 300 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Anthony Holmes Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.4 disruption score.
Usage Score
6.6
Efficiency
29.4
Consistency
30.2
Season Value
41.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Texas Tech
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Holmes Jr., DL. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Texas Tech. Anthony Holmes Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.4 disruption score.
Anthony Holmes Jr. played DL for Houston and Texas Tech. Across 4 tracked seasons, Anthony Holmes Jr. recorded 8 receiving yards and 102 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Texas Tech.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas Tech paired 25.5 primary output with 29.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 29.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Houston, Texas Tech.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.8
Efficiency
29.4
Usage
6.6
Consistency
30.2
Best Game by takeover score
Kent State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 0. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 1. Kent State: 6. Oregon State: 1. Utah: 0. Houston: 1. Kansas: 4.5. Arizona State: 4. Oklahoma State: 1. Kansas State: 3. BYU: 0. UCF: 0. West Virginia: 1. BYU: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 3 by 12.5. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 3 by 22.5. Kent State: 4 by 66.7. Oregon State: 3 by 22.5. Utah: 3 by 12.5. Houston: 4 by 26.7. Kansas: 4 by 61.7. Arizona State: 4 by 56.7. Oklahoma State: 2 by 18.3. Kansas State: 1 by 34.2. BYU: 4 by 16.7. UCF: 1 by 4.2. West Virginia: 1 by 14.2. BYU: 3 by 42.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | vs Oregon | L 0-23 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/6 | vs BYUSplash game | W 34-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ West Virginia | W 49-0 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs UCF | W 48-9 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs BYU | W 29-7 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Kansas StateSplash game | W 43-20 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Oklahoma State | W 42-0 | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arizona StateSplash game | L 22-26 | 4 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Kansas2+ sacks · Splash game | W 42-17 | 4 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Houston | W 35-11 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Utah | W 34-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Oregon State | W 45-14 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Kent StateSplash game | W 62-14 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff | W 67-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Houston
2022-2024
Opening stop
Texas Tech
2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Houston | 3.5 | 21.4 | 7.8 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Houston | 10 | 20.4 | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Houston | 16 | 25.5 | 9.3 | 6 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas Tech | 25.5 | 29.4 | 6.6 | 9.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 25.5 | 29.4 | 6.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 60.6 takeover score.
#2
Arizona
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.3 takeover score.
#3
Cincinnati
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57 takeover score.
#4
Sam Houston
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56.8 takeover score.
#5
Temple
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.6 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Texas Tech
25.5 primary output · 29.4 efficiency · 6.6 usage
41.5
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas Tech
41.5
25.5 primary · 29.4 efficiency · 6.6 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Houston
35
16 primary · 25.5 efficiency · 9.3 usage
1
Impact games
13
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8656
Westfield · Houston, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
102
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 38 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.