Usage Score
6.1
Player Dossier
2022-2025Baylor
TE • 6'3" • 248 lbs • Red Oak, TX, USA
Kelsey Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
6.1
Efficiency
80
Consistency
65
Season Value
47.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Baylor
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kelsey Johnson, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Baylor. Kelsey Johnson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kelsey Johnson played TE for Baylor. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kelsey Johnson recorded 2 rushing yards, 174 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Baylor.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Baylor paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 50th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
11
Efficiency
80
Usage
6.1
Consistency
65
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. UCF: 15. Houston: 18
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCF
Best efficiency game
100 vs UCF
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Baylor
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Postseason | Baylor | 61 | 35.3 | 11.4 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Baylor | 61 | 35.3 | 11.4 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Baylor | 80 | 43.8 | 7.5 | 19 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Baylor | 0 | — | — | -80 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Baylor | 33 | 80 | 6.1 | 33 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
28
Primary metric
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#2
UCF
15
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
TCU
30
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
Houston
18
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#5
Air Force
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Baylor
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2023 Regular Season · Baylor
51.1
80 primary · 43.8 efficiency · 7.5 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Baylor
47.9
33 primary · 80 efficiency · 6.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2026 · Rating 0.835
Callaway · Hogansville, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
174
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 18 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.