Player Stats

Owen Pewee College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
102
TFL
17
Sacks
3
QB hurries
10
Passes defended
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonUTSA12-0--040.3
2023 PostseasonUTSA132-0-1053.9
2023 Regular SeasonUTSA13286.5141053.9
2024 PostseasonUTSA133-0--047.5
2024 Regular SeasonUTSA13396.52-2047.5
2025 PostseasonUTSA1230.5021048.7
2025 Regular SeasonUTSA12253.504-048.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

UTSA paired 14.5 primary output with 21.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 18.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida International

Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · UTSA

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.9

Efficiency

18.9

Usage

5.6

Consistency

52.8

Best Game by takeover score

Florida International

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 3.5. Texas A&M: 1. Texas State: 1. Incarnate Word: 0. Colorado State: 1. Temple: 2. Rice: 1. North Texas: 0. South Florida: 0.5. Charlotte: 1. East Carolina: 0. Army: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 3 by 47.5. Texas A&M: 0 by 10. Texas State: 4 by 26.7. Incarnate Word: 1 by 4.2. Colorado State: 6 by 35. Temple: 1 by 24.2. Rice: 1 by 14.2. North Texas: 4 by 16.7. South Florida: 1 by 9.2. Charlotte: 2 by 18.3. East Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Army: 3 by 12.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.1 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 6 · -0.3 vs Wins