Usage Score
8.3
Player Dossier
2022-2025Middle Tennessee
Amorion Walker
WR • 6'4" • 179 lbs • Ponchatoula, LA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Amorion Walker reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
66
Consistency
50.4
Season Value
55.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Michigan
22232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Michigan • Middle Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Amorion Walker, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Michigan. Amorion Walker reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Amorion Walker played WR for Michigan and Middle Tennessee. Across 4 tracked seasons, Amorion Walker recorded 239 receiving yards, 3 tackles, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Middle Tennessee.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Michigan paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 66 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Middle Tennessee.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
25.1
Efficiency
66
Usage
8.3
Consistency
50.4
Best Game by takeover score
Sam Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 10. Wisconsin: 15. Nevada: 23. Marshall: 67. Kennesaw State: 15. Delaware: 13. Western Kentucky: 21. Sam Houston: 37
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 33.3. Wisconsin: 2 by 50. Nevada: 3 by 51.1. Marshall: 2 by 100. Kennesaw State: 2 by 50. Delaware: 2 by 43.3. Western Kentucky: 1 by 100. Sam Houston: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins30 · Games = 2 · +3.8 vs Losses
Losses26.2 · Games = 5 · -3.8 vs Wins
First Half28.8 · Games = 4 · +7.3 vs Second Half
Second Half21.5 · Games = 4 · -7.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
100 vs Sam Houston
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/22 | vs Sam Houston | W 31-17 | — | 1 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Western Kentucky | L 26-42 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Wed 10/22 | @ Delaware | L 28-31 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Kennesaw State | L 16-24 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Marshall | L 28-42 | — | 2 | 67 | 33.5 | 33.50 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Nevada | W 14-13 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Wisconsin | L 10-42 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2022-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Middle Tennessee
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2022202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Michigan | 4 | 26.7 | 4.8 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | -4 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Michigan | 34 | 70 | 8.9 | 34 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 201 | 66 | 8.3 | 167 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Marshall
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67
Primary metric
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Washington
22
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Sam Houston
37
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Western Kentucky
21
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UConn
4
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Michigan
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2025 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
55.9
201 primary · 66 efficiency · 8.3 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Michigan
42.3
34 primary · 70 efficiency · 8.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8826
Ponchatoula · Ponchatoula, LA
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
239
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 14 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.