Usage Score
8.9
Player Dossier
2022-2025Arizona State
LB • 5'11" • 220 lbs • Duncanville, TX, USA
Jordan Crook shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 43.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
8.9
Efficiency
43.3
Consistency
46.8
Season Value
49.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Arizona State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Crook, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Arizona State. Jordan Crook shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 43.3 disruption score.
Jordan Crook played LB for Arkansas and Arizona State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jordan Crook recorded 191 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Arizona State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Arizona State paired 15 primary output with 43.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 43.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arkansas, Arizona State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
43.3
Usage
8.9
Consistency
46.8
Best Game by takeover score
Texas State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 1. Northern Arizona: 2. Mississippi State: 0. Texas State: 4.5. Baylor: 0. TCU: 3. Utah: 0. Texas Tech: 0. Houston: 2. Iowa State: 1. West Virginia: 0.5. Colorado: 1. Arizona: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 9 by 47.5. Northern Arizona: 7 by 49.2. Mississippi State: 5 by 20.8. Texas State: 12 by 95. Baylor: 9 by 37.5. TCU: 7 by 59.2. Utah: 2 by 8.3. Texas Tech: 7 by 29.2. Houston: 11 by 65.8. Iowa State: 6 by 35. West Virginia: 14 by 55. Colorado: 1 by 14.2. Arizona: 11 by 45.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas State
Best efficiency game
95 vs Texas State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | @ Duke | L 39-42 | 9 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Arizona10+ tackles | L 7-23 | 11 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Colorado | W 42-17 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs West Virginia10+ tackles | W 25-23 | 14 | 10 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Iowa State | W 24-19 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/26 | vs Houston10+ tackles · Splash game | L 16-24 | 11 | 6 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Texas Tech | W 26-22 | 7 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/12 | @ Utah | L 10-42 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs TCUSplash game | W 27-24 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Baylor | W 27-24 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Texas State10+ tackles · Splash game | W 34-15 | 12 | 7 | — | 3.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Mississippi State | L 20-24 | 5 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Northern ArizonaSplash game | W 38-19 | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arkansas
2022-2023
Opening stop
Arizona State
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Arkansas | 0 | 6.9 | 1.3 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Arkansas | 3 | 14.7 | 3.4 | 3 |
| 2024 Postseason | Arizona State | 6.5 | 27.5 | 7.1 | 3.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Arizona State | 6.5 | 27.5 | 7.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Arizona State | 15 | 43.3 | 8.9 | 8.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Arizona State | 15 | 43.3 | 8.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Texas State
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5
Primary metric
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 71.5 takeover score.
#2
Florida International
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.5 takeover score.
#3
BYU
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.2 takeover score.
#4
TCU
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 45.8 takeover score.
#5
Texas
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 44 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Arizona State
15 primary output · 43.3 efficiency · 8.9 usage
49.8
#2
2025 Regular Season · Arizona State
49.8
15 primary · 43.3 efficiency · 8.9 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Arkansas
36.1
0 primary · 6.9 efficiency · 1.3 usage
1
Impact games
6
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2026 · Rating 0.835
Fairhope · Fairhope, AL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
191
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 37 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.