Player Stats

Barion Brown College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,060
Receptions
175
Touchdowns
26

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2022 PostseasonKentucky13524072.5
2022 Regular SeasonKentucky1345604672.5
2023 PostseasonKentucky133100469
2023 Regular SeasonKentucky1340439769
2024 Regular SeasonKentucky1129361664.5
2025 PostseasonLSU13137271.1
2025 Regular SeasonLSU1352495171.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

Kentucky paired 628 primary output with 60.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 67.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Kentucky, LSU.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · LSU

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

40.9

Efficiency

67.4

Usage

17.9

Consistency

72.6

Best Game by takeover score

Louisiana Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Houston: 37. Clemson: 25. Louisiana Tech: 94. Florida: 26. SE Louisiana: 54. Ole Miss: 40. South Carolina: 22. Vanderbilt: 40. Texas A&M: 60. Alabama: 44. Arkansas: 44. Western Kentucky: 37. Oklahoma: 9

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 1 by 100. Clemson: 5 by 33.3. Louisiana Tech: 8 by 78.3. Florida: 2 by 86.7. SE Louisiana: 5 by 72. Ole Miss: 5 by 53.3. South Carolina: 2 by 73.3. Vanderbilt: 5 by 53.3. Texas A&M: 4 by 100. Alabama: 5 by 58.7. Arkansas: 3 by 97.8. Western Kentucky: 5 by 49.3. Oklahoma: 3 by 20

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins43.1 · Games = 7 · +4.8 vs Losses
Losses38.3 · Games = 6 · -4.8 vs Wins