Player Stats

Cameron Whitfield College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
118
TFL
17.5
Sacks
15
QB hurries
9
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2021 PostseasonLouisiana11-0--037.2
2022 Regular SeasonLouisiana77-0--036.8
2023 PostseasonLouisiana12611--059
2023 Regular SeasonLouisiana1238873-059
2024 Regular SeasonLouisiana12367631051.8
2025 PostseasonLouisiana11311--025.8
2025 Regular SeasonLouisiana11270.503-025.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Louisiana paired 20 primary output with 30.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 17.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Delaware

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Louisiana

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

17.3

Usage

4.6

Consistency

15.2

Best Game by takeover score

Delaware

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Delaware: 2. Rice: 0.5. Missouri: 1. Eastern Michigan: 2. Marshall: 0. James Madison: 0. Southern Miss: 0. Troy: 0. Texas State: 0. Arkansas State: 0. UL Monroe: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Delaware: 3 by 32.5. Rice: 5 by 25.8. Missouri: 1 by 14.2. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 36.7. Marshall: 4 by 16.7. James Madison: 2 by 8.3. Southern Miss: 3 by 12.5. Troy: 1 by 4.2. Texas State: 1 by 4.2. Arkansas State: 2 by 8.3. UL Monroe: 4 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.3 · Games = 4 · -0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 7 · +0.5 vs Wins