Player Stats

Camby Goff College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
163
TFL
8
Sacks
2.5
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
15

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonAir Force4130.50--015.8
2021 PostseasonAir Force10610--051.7
2021 Regular SeasonAir Force10353.52-3051.7
2022 Regular SeasonAir Force12390.50.519060.9
2023 Regular SeasonAir Force13-0--045.3
2024 Regular SeasonAir Force11672.5013043.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Air Force paired 14 primary output with 25.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 32.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: San José State

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Air Force

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

32.2

Usage

9.1

Consistency

12.1

Best Game by takeover score

San José State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Merrimack: 0. San José State: 3. Wyoming: 1. Navy: 0.5. New Mexico: 0. Colorado State: 1. Army: 0. Fresno State: 0. Oregon State: 2. Nevada: 0. San Diego State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Merrimack: 5 by 20.8. San José State: 5 by 50.8. Wyoming: 6 by 35. Navy: 9 by 42.5. New Mexico: 7 by 29.2. Colorado State: 8 by 43.3. Army: 7 by 29.2. Fresno State: 4 by 16.7. Oregon State: 2 by 28.3. Nevada: 4 by 16.7. San Diego State: 10 by 41.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.4 · Games = 5 · -0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · Games = 6 · +0.5 vs Wins