Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
South Carolina paired 928 primary output with 75.1 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Postseason | South Carolina | 12 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 76.2 |
| 2022 Regular Season | South Carolina | 12 | 63 | 898 | 7 | 76.2 |
| 2023 Regular Season | South Carolina | 2 | 3 | 37 | 1 | 37.5 |
| 2024 Postseason | Ole Miss | 11 | 1 | 32 | 1 | 65.3 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 11 | 27 | 521 | 5 | 65.3 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
South Carolina paired 928 primary output with 75.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 93.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across South Carolina, Ole Miss.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
50.3
Efficiency
93.3
Usage
12.4
Consistency
67
Best Game by takeover score
South Carolina
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 32. Furman: 70. Middle Tennessee: 78. Wake Forest: 60. Georgia Southern: 66. South Carolina: 97. Oklahoma: 39. Arkansas: 59. Georgia: 27. Florida: 25. Mississippi State: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 1 by 100. Furman: 2 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 6 by 86.7. Wake Forest: 3 by 100. Georgia Southern: 3 by 100. South Carolina: 3 by 100. Oklahoma: 3 by 86.7. Arkansas: 3 by 100. Georgia: 3 by 60. Florida: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.