Player Stats

Syaire Riley College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
130
TFL
12
Sacks
2
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonNew Mexico36-0--040
2021 Regular SeasonNew Mexico10425111060.3
2022 Regular SeasonNew Mexico834301-045.6
2023 Regular SeasonNew Mexico1048412-056.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season

New Mexico paired 8 primary output with 25.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 27 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Utah State

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · New Mexico

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

27

Usage

8.8

Consistency

37.1

Best Game by takeover score

Utah State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 2. Tennessee Tech: 0.5. New Mexico State: 0. Massachusetts: 1. Wyoming: 0. San José State: 0.5. UNLV: 0. Boise State: 1. Fresno State: 0. Utah State: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 3 by 32.5. Tennessee Tech: 8 by 38.3. New Mexico State: 6 by 25. Massachusetts: 9 by 47.5. Wyoming: 2 by 8.3. San José State: 3 by 17.5. UNLV: 3 by 12.5. Boise State: 6 by 35. Fresno State: 2 by 8.3. Utah State: 6 by 45

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.5 · Games = 3 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 7 · +0.3 vs Wins