Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
New Mexico paired 10.5 primary output with 20.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | New Mexico | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2021 Regular Season | New Mexico | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 32.7 |
| 2022 Regular Season | New Mexico | 10 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0 | 33.3 |
| 2023 Regular Season | New Mexico | 10 | 25 | 6 | 3.5 | 1 | - | 0 | 65.1 |
| 2024 Regular Season | New Mexico | 7 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 2 | - | 0 | 24.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
New Mexico paired 10.5 primary output with 20.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 15 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
15
Usage
4.8
Consistency
14.3
Best Game by takeover score
Colorado State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 0. Montana State: 0. Auburn: 0. Fresno State: 0. Air Force: 1. Colorado State: 1. Wyoming: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 3 by 12.5. Montana State: 4 by 16.7. Auburn: 2 by 8.3. Fresno State: 2 by 8.3. Air Force: 3 by 22.5. Colorado State: 2 by 18.3. Wyoming: 2 by 18.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.