Usage Score
7.3
Player Dossier
2020-2024Tennessee
Doneiko Slaughter
DB • 6'0" • 190 lbs • Roswell, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Doneiko Slaughter shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
33.5
Consistency
51.3
Season Value
26.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Arkansas
20212122232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Tennessee • Arkansas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Doneiko Slaughter, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Arkansas. Doneiko Slaughter shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Arkansas paired 11 primary output with 33.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 33.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tennessee, Arkansas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Arkansas
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
33.5
Usage
7.3
Consistency
51.3
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 1. Unknown: 0. Oklahoma State: 2. UAB: 1. Auburn: 4. Texas A&M: 0. Tennessee: 1. LSU: 0. Mississippi State: 1. Ole Miss: 0. Texas: 1. Louisiana Tech: 0. Missouri: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 4 by 26.7. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Oklahoma State: 6 by 45. UAB: 7 by 39.2. Auburn: 7 by 69.2. Texas A&M: 3 by 12.5. Tennessee: 8 by 43.3. LSU: 10 by 41.7. Mississippi State: 7 by 39.2. Ole Miss: 6 by 25. Texas: 3 by 22.5. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 25. Missouri: 9 by 37.5
Split Comparison
Wins1.3 · n=6 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · n=6 · -0.8 vs Wins
First Half1.3 · n=7 · +1.0 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · n=6 · -1.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Auburn
Best efficiency game
69.2 vs Auburn
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | vs Texas Tech | W 39-26 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Missouri | L 21-28 | 9 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 35-14 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Texas | L 10-20 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Ole Miss | L 31-63 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Mississippi State | W 58-25 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs LSU10+ tackles | L 10-34 | 10 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Tennessee | W 19-14 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Texas A&M | L 17-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ AuburnSplash game | W 24-14 | 7 | 7 | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs UAB | W 37-27 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Oklahoma State | L 31-39 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tennessee
2020-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Arkansas
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
2020202120212022202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Tennessee | 2 | 17.8 | 4.5 | — |
| 2021 Postseason | Tennessee | 4 | 13.3 | 3.7 | 2 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Tennessee | 4 | 13.3 | 3.7 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Tennessee | 4.5 | 17 | 2.8 | 0.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Tennessee | 3 | 27.2 | 4.8 | -1.5 |
| 2024 Postseason | Arkansas | 11 | 33.5 | 7.3 | 8 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Arkansas | 11 | 33.5 | 7.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Auburn
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 70.5 takeover score.
#2
UConn
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.5 takeover score.
#3
South Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.5 takeover score.
#4
Georgia
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.7 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Arkansas
11 primary output · 33.5 efficiency · 7.3 usage
26.5
#2
2024 Regular Season · Arkansas
26.5
11 primary · 33.5 efficiency · 7.3 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Tennessee
19.8
4.5 primary · 17 efficiency · 2.8 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8844
Roswell · Roswell, GA
- Committed To
- Tennessee
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
160
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.