Player Stats

Preston Fox College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
594
Receptions
46
Touchdowns
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonWest Virginia1-00100
2021 Regular SeasonWest Virginia118043
2022 Regular SeasonWest Virginia4441133.4
2023 Regular SeasonWest Virginia1226368275.6
2024 PostseasonWest Virginia11319037.2
2024 Regular SeasonWest Virginia119112037.2
2025 Regular SeasonWest Virginia8346034.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

West Virginia paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 91.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ohio

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · West Virginia

Games

8

Receiving Yards / G

5.8

Efficiency

91.1

Usage

7.1

Consistency

12.5

Best Game by takeover score

Ohio

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Robert Morris: 0. Ohio: 20. Pittsburgh: 12. BYU: 14. TCU: 0. Houston: 0. Colorado: 0. Arizona State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 1 by 100. Pittsburgh: 1 by 80. BYU: 1 by 93.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins3 · Games = 4 · -5.5 vs Losses
Losses8.5 · Games = 4 · +5.5 vs Wins