Player Stats

Tyrell Robinson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,349
Rushing yards
1,630
Receiving yards
719
Touchdowns
15

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonArmy11541424117248.9
2021 PostseasonArmy1348642065.7
2021 Regular SeasonArmy13901603298665.7
2022 Regular SeasonArmy5456321135462.5
2023 Regular SeasonArmy826418777247
2024 PostseasonArmy825250030
2024 Regular SeasonArmy81146450130

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Army paired 949 primary output with 77.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 46.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Win with 54 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Army

Games

8

Scrimmage Yards / G

17.4

Efficiency

46.9

Usage

4.6

Consistency

45.3

Best Game by takeover score

UTSA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Louisiana Tech: 25. East Carolina: 23. Air Force: 9. North Texas: 18. Notre Dame: 10. UTSA: 54. Tulane: 0. Navy: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 65.1. East Carolina: 1 by 100. Air Force: 3 by 28.1. North Texas: 3 by 62.5. Notre Dame: 3 by 34.7. UTSA: 8 by 38.1. Tulane: 1 by 0

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins21.5 · Games = 6 · +16.5 vs Losses
Losses5 · Games = 2 · -16.5 vs Wins