Player Stats

Justin Jones College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
116
Rushing yards
110
Receiving yards
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonUAB00000-
2021 Regular SeasonUAB00000-
2022 Regular SeasonAuburn00000-
2023 Regular SeasonAuburn133330065
2024 Regular SeasonAuburn124240062.2
2025 Regular SeasonAuburn759536040.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Auburn paired 33 primary output with 84.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 38.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UAB, Auburn.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Mercer

Win with 38 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Auburn

Games

7

Scrimmage Yards / G

8.4

Efficiency

38.7

Usage

3.6

Consistency

13.5

Best Game by takeover score

Mercer

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 0. Ball State: 6. South Alabama: 0. Texas A&M: 0. Missouri: 1. Mercer: 38. Alabama: 14

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ball State: 2 by 31.3. Missouri: 1 by 10.4. Mercer: 7 by 59.1. Alabama: 3 by 53.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins11 · Games = 4 · +6 vs Losses
Losses5 · Games = 3 · -6 vs Wins