Player Stats

Mac McWilliams College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
132
TFL
12.5
Sacks
1
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
24
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonUAB46-01-011.9
2021 PostseasonUAB80-0--036.2
2021 Regular SeasonUAB82330-4036.2
2022 Regular SeasonUAB71910-10253.1
2023 Regular SeasonUAB125220-8050.6
2024 Regular SeasonUCF11326.51-2055.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

UCF paired 10.5 primary output with 22.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 22.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UAB, UCF.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Colorado

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · UCF

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1.0

Efficiency

22.6

Usage

6.6

Consistency

55.9

Best Game by takeover score

Colorado

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. New Hampshire: 1. Sam Houston: 1. TCU: 0. Colorado: 3. Florida: 1. Cincinnati: 0. Iowa State: 0. Arizona: 1. Arizona State: 1.5. West Virginia: 2. Utah: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Hampshire: 4 by 26.7. TCU: 2 by 8.3. Colorado: 6 by 55. Florida: 5 by 30.8. Cincinnati: 3 by 12.5. Iowa State: 1 by 4.2. Arizona: 3 by 22.5. Arizona State: 2 by 23.3. West Virginia: 5 by 40.8. Utah: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 4 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · Games = 7 · +0.3 vs Wins