Usage Score
24.9
Player Dossier
2020-2022UAB
Trea Shropshire
WR • 6'3" • 195 lbs • Zachary, LA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Trea Shropshire reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
96.4
Consistency
50.7
Season Value
68
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · UAB
2021212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UAB
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trea Shropshire, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · UAB. Trea Shropshire reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
UAB paired 923 primary output with 96.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 96.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · UAB
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
83.9
Efficiency
96.4
Usage
24.9
Consistency
50.7
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 183. Liberty: 56. Rice: 65. Middle Tennessee: 193. Charlotte: 48. Western Kentucky: 27. Florida Atlantic: 60. UTSA: 97. North Texas: 66. LSU: 54. Louisiana Tech: 74
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 6 by 100. Liberty: 1 by 100. Rice: 4 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 6 by 100. Charlotte: 3 by 100. Western Kentucky: 2 by 90. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 100. UTSA: 7 by 92.4. North Texas: 5 by 88. LSU: 4 by 90. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins112.8 · n=5 · +53.0 vs Losses
Losses59.8 · n=6 · -53.0 vs Wins
First Half95.3 · n=6 · +25.1 vs Second Half
Second Half70.2 · n=5 · -25.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/16 | vs Miami (OH)100 receiving yards | W 24-20 | — | 6 | 183 | 30.5 | 30.50 | 1 | 49 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 37-27 | — | 1 | 74 | 74 | 74 | 1 | 74 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ LSU | L 10-41 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs North Texas | W 41-21 | — | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs UTSA | L 38-44 | — | 7 | 97 | 13.9 | 13.90 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 17-24 | — | 2 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Western Kentucky | L 17-20 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Charlotte | W 34-20 | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Middle Tennessee100 receiving yards | W 41-14 | — | 6 | 193 | 32.2 | 32.20 | 1 | 68 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Rice | L 24-28 | — | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Liberty | L 14-21 | — | 1 | 56 | 56 | 56 | 0 | 56 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UAB
2020-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20202021202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | UAB | 310 | 70.4 | 11.6 | — |
| 2021 Postseason | UAB | 703 | 93.5 | 15.5 | 393 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UAB | 703 | 93.5 | 15.5 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | UAB | 923 | 96.4 | 24.9 | 220 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UAB | 923 | 96.4 | 24.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Marshall
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
180
Primary metric
180 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Middle Tennessee
193
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
193 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Miami (OH)
183
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
183 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
127
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UTSA
130
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · UAB
923 primary output · 96.4 efficiency · 24.9 usage
68
#2
2022 Regular Season · UAB
68
923 primary · 96.4 efficiency · 24.9 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · UAB
63.1
703 primary · 93.5 efficiency · 15.5 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8253
Stoney Creek · Rochester, MI
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,936
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.