Player Stats

Chase Ketterer College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
13
Rushing yards
9
Receiving yards
4
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonNotre Dame00000-
2021 Regular SeasonNotre Dame00000-
2022 Regular SeasonNotre Dame00000-
2023 PostseasonNotre Dame3660156
2023 Regular SeasonNotre Dame3734056

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Notre Dame paired 13 primary output with 42.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 42.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State

Win with 6 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Notre Dame

Games

3

Scrimmage Yards / G

4.3

Efficiency

42.4

Usage

1.8

Consistency

76.7

Best Game by takeover score

Oregon State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oregon State: 6. Tennessee State: 4. Central Michigan: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon State: 1 by 62.5. Tennessee State: 1 by 33.3. Central Michigan: 1 by 31.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half5 · Games = 2 · +2 vs Second Half
Second Half3 · Games = 1 · -2 vs First Half