Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Washington paired 1,385 primary output with 51 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Mississippi State | 10 | 70 | 57 | 13 | 0 | 45.1 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 10 | 312 | 168 | 144 | 4 | 45.1 |
| 2021 Postseason | Mississippi State | 13 | 88 | 62 | 26 | 0 | 63.6 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 13 | 819 | 423 | 396 | 5 | 63.6 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 10 | 773 | 499 | 274 | 3 | 62.4 |
| 2023 Postseason | Washington | 14 | 124 | 82 | 42 | 2 | 78 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Washington | 14 | 1,261 | 1,113 | 148 | 15 | 78 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Washington paired 1,385 primary output with 51 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 51 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Mississippi State, Washington.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Scrimmage Yards / G
98.9
Efficiency
51
Usage
34.9
Consistency
61.1
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 57. Texas: 67. Boise State: 32. Michigan State: 71. California: 75. Arizona: 139. Oregon: 110. Arizona State: 15. Stanford: 84. USC: 267. Utah: 132. Oregon State: 89. Washington State: 88. Oregon: 159
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 13 by 37. Texas: 24 by 26.2. Boise State: 10 by 24. Michigan State: 8 by 87. California: 11 by 69.7. Arizona: 21 by 63.1. Oregon: 22 by 52.1. Arizona State: 10 by 10.9. Stanford: 18 by 48.6. USC: 28 by 89.7. Utah: 25 by 50.3. Oregon State: 16 by 57.9. Washington State: 22 by 41.1. Oregon: 29 by 56.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.