Usage Score
26.6
Player Dossier
2020-2022Mississippi State
Malik Heath
WR • 6'3" • 215 lbs • Jackson, MS, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Malik Heath reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.8
Consistency
68.3
Season Value
69.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Ole Miss
2020212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Mississippi State • Ole Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Malik Heath, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Ole Miss. Malik Heath reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Ole Miss paired 971 primary output with 82.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Mississippi State, Ole Miss.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: LSU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Ole Miss
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
80.9
Efficiency
82.8
Usage
26.6
Consistency
68.3
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 137. Troy: 15. Unknown: 52. Georgia Tech: 78. Tulsa: 75. Kentucky: 100. Vanderbilt: 26. LSU: 145. Texas A&M: 0. Alabama: 123. Arkansas: 140. Mississippi State: 80
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 8 by 100. Troy: 2 by 50. Unknown: 3 by 100. Georgia Tech: 4 by 100. Tulsa: 4 by 100. Kentucky: 6 by 100. Vanderbilt: 4 by 43.3. LSU: 8 by 100. Texas A&M: 1 by 0. Alabama: 6 by 100. Arkansas: 9 by 100. Mississippi State: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins49 · n=6 · -76 vs Losses
Losses125 · n=5 · +76 vs Wins
First Half76.2 · n=6 · -9.5 vs Second Half
Second Half85.7 · n=6 · +9.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
LSU
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | vs Texas Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | L 25-42 | — | 8 | 137 | 17.1 | 17.10 | 1 | 30 |
| Fri 11/25 | vs Mississippi State | L 22-24 | — | 5 | 80 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 28 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Arkansas100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-42 | — | 9 | 140 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Alabama100 receiving yards | L 24-30 | — | 6 | 123 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Texas A&M | W 31-28 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ LSU100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-45 | — | 8 | 145 | 18.1 | 18.10 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Vanderbilt | W 52-28 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Kentucky100 receiving yards | W 22-19 | — | 6 | 100 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Tulsa | W 35-27 | — | 4 | 75 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Georgia Tech | W 42-0 | — | 4 | 78 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Troy | W 28-10 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 1 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Mississippi State
2020-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Ole Miss
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
20202020202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Mississippi State | 307 | 48.9 | 11 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 307 | 48.9 | 11 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 442 | 69.8 | 7.9 | 135 |
| 2022 Postseason | Ole Miss | 971 | 82.8 | 26.6 | 529 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 971 | 82.8 | 26.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
LSU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
145
Primary metric
145 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arkansas
140
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas Tech
137
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
137 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Alabama
123
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Kentucky
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Ole Miss
971 primary output · 82.8 efficiency · 26.6 usage
69.4
#2
2022 Regular Season · Ole Miss
69.4
971 primary · 82.8 efficiency · 26.6 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Mississippi State
46.7
442 primary · 69.8 efficiency · 7.9 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.9311
Callaway · Jackson, MS
- Committed To
- Mississippi State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,720
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.