Player Dossier

2021-2025

TCU

Devean Deal

EDGE • 6'4" • 250 lbs • Garland, TX, USA

Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile

Devean Deal shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.3 disruption score.

Usage Score

10

Efficiency

29.3

Consistency

51

Season Value

30.3

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · TCU

2122232324242525

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
8
Program Path
Tulane • TCU
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: UAB

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Devean Deal, EDGE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · TCU. Devean Deal shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.3 disruption score.

Devean Deal played EDGE for Tulane and TCU. Across 5 tracked seasons, Devean Deal recorded 173 tackles and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with TCU.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

TCU paired 16 primary output with 29.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 29.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tulane, TCU.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · TCU

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.2

Efficiency

29.3

Usage

10

Consistency

51

Best Game by takeover score

USC

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. USC: 0. North Carolina: 0.5. Unknown: 0.5. SMU: 0. Arizona State: 3. Colorado: 0. Kansas State: 2. Baylor: 2. West Virginia: 1. Iowa State: 2.5. BYU: 2. Houston: 0.5. Cincinnati: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 3 by 12.5. North Carolina: 3 by 17.5. Unknown: 7 by 34.2. SMU: 2 by 8.3. Arizona State: 8 by 63.3. Colorado: 2 by 8.3. Kansas State: 1 by 24.2. Baylor: 2 by 28.3. West Virginia: 6 by 35. Iowa State: 5 by 45.8. BYU: 4 by 36.7. Houston: 6 by 30. Cincinnati: 4 by 36.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 8 · -1.6 vs Losses
Losses2.4 · Games = 4 · +1.6 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · Games = 7 · -0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half1.7 · Games = 6 · +0.8 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Havoc Plays

Top game by takeover score

Arizona State

Best efficiency game

63.3 vs Arizona State

Result
Wed 12/31vs USCW 30-2730000
Sat 11/29vs CincinnatiW 45-2342110
Sat 11/22@ HoustonW 17-14640.5000
Sun 11/16@ BYUSplash gameL 13-4442200
Sat 11/8vs Iowa StateL 17-20531.5001
Sat 10/25@ West VirginiaW 23-1763001
Sat 10/18vs BaylorW 42-36200.500.501
Sat 10/11@ Kansas StateL 28-4111110
Sat 10/4vs ColoradoW 35-2121000
Sat 9/27@ Arizona StateL 24-2785111
Sat 9/20vs SMUW 35-2422000
Sun 9/14vs Unknown740.5000
Tue 9/2@ North CarolinaW 48-14300.5000

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Tulane

    2021-2023

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    TCU

    2024-2025

    Final stop

Season Progression

20212022202320232024202420252025
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2021 Regular SeasonTulane216.34.6
2022 Regular SeasonTulane5.519.15.63.5
2023 PostseasonTulane2027.111.114.5
2023 Regular SeasonTulane2027.111.10
2024 PostseasonTCU1629.310.7-4
2024 Regular SeasonTCU1629.310.70
2025 PostseasonTCU1629.3100
2025 Regular SeasonTCU1629.3100

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

UAB

Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

5

Primary metric

5 disruption/tackle impact with 72.1 takeover score.

#2

Utah

4

Primary metric

Win with backfield disruption leading the way.

4 disruption/tackle impact with 60.7 takeover score.

#3

Arizona State

3

Primary metric

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

3 disruption/tackle impact with 58.8 takeover score.

#4

Iowa State

2.5

Primary metric

Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 48.6 takeover score.

#5

East Carolina

2

Primary metric

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.3 takeover score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2025 Postseason · TCU

16 primary output · 29.3 efficiency · 10 usage

30.3

#2

2025 Regular Season · TCU

30.3

16 primary · 29.3 efficiency · 10 usage

#3

2023 Postseason · Tulane

28.1

20 primary · 27.1 efficiency · 11.1 usage

Milestones

2

Impact games

5

Splash games

1

10+ tackle games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2023 · Rating 0.9417

Naaman Forest · Garland, TX

Committed To
TCU
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2023

Career Facts

2

Career teams

8

Seasons tracked

173

Career Tackles

Data Context

Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 50 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.