Usage Score
10
Player Dossier
2021-2025TCU
EDGE • 6'4" • 250 lbs • Garland, TX, USA
Devean Deal shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
10
Efficiency
29.3
Consistency
51
Season Value
30.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · TCU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Devean Deal, EDGE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · TCU. Devean Deal shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.3 disruption score.
Devean Deal played EDGE for Tulane and TCU. Across 5 tracked seasons, Devean Deal recorded 173 tackles and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with TCU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
TCU paired 16 primary output with 29.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 29.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tulane, TCU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
29.3
Usage
10
Consistency
51
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 0. North Carolina: 0.5. Unknown: 0.5. SMU: 0. Arizona State: 3. Colorado: 0. Kansas State: 2. Baylor: 2. West Virginia: 1. Iowa State: 2.5. BYU: 2. Houston: 0.5. Cincinnati: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 3 by 12.5. North Carolina: 3 by 17.5. Unknown: 7 by 34.2. SMU: 2 by 8.3. Arizona State: 8 by 63.3. Colorado: 2 by 8.3. Kansas State: 1 by 24.2. Baylor: 2 by 28.3. West Virginia: 6 by 35. Iowa State: 5 by 45.8. BYU: 4 by 36.7. Houston: 6 by 30. Cincinnati: 4 by 36.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
63.3 vs Arizona State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | vs USC | W 30-27 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Cincinnati | W 45-23 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Houston | W 17-14 | 6 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/16 | @ BYUSplash game | L 13-44 | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Iowa State | L 17-20 | 5 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ West Virginia | W 23-17 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Baylor | W 42-36 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Kansas State | L 28-41 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Colorado | W 35-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Arizona State | L 24-27 | 8 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs SMU | W 35-24 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | 7 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Tue 9/2 | @ North Carolina | W 48-14 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulane
2021-2023
Opening stop
TCU
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Tulane | 2 | 16.3 | 4.6 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Tulane | 5.5 | 19.1 | 5.6 | 3.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Tulane | 20 | 27.1 | 11.1 | 14.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Tulane | 20 | 27.1 | 11.1 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | TCU | 16 | 29.3 | 10.7 | -4 |
| 2024 Regular Season | TCU | 16 | 29.3 | 10.7 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | TCU | 16 | 29.3 | 10 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | TCU | 16 | 29.3 | 10 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 72.1 takeover score.
#2
Utah
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 60.7 takeover score.
#3
Arizona State
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58.8 takeover score.
#4
Iowa State
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 48.6 takeover score.
#5
East Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · TCU
16 primary output · 29.3 efficiency · 10 usage
30.3
#2
2025 Regular Season · TCU
30.3
16 primary · 29.3 efficiency · 10 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Tulane
28.1
20 primary · 27.1 efficiency · 11.1 usage
2
Impact games
5
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9417
Naaman Forest · Garland, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
173
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 50 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.