Player Stats

Nick Mosley College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
502
Rushing yards
484
Receiving yards
18
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonBowling Green93403364262
2022 Regular SeasonBowling Green81069214038.9
2023 Regular SeasonBowling Green356560040

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season

Bowling Green paired 340 primary output with 42.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 61.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Michigan

Loss with 33 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Bowling Green

Games

3

Scrimmage Yards / G

18.7

Efficiency

61.7

Usage

5.2

Consistency

67

Best Game by takeover score

Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Eastern Illinois: 20. Michigan: 33. Ohio: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Eastern Illinois: 3 by 69.4. Michigan: 4 by 84.4. Ohio: 1 by 31.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins20 · Games = 1 · +2 vs Losses
Losses18 · Games = 2 · -2 vs Wins