Player Stats

Cole Harrity College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
669
Receptions
77
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonNew Mexico State0-000.1
2021 Regular SeasonNew Mexico State930238151.9
2022 Regular SeasonBuffalo1012137141.6
2023 Regular SeasonBuffalo1235294360.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Buffalo paired 294 primary output with 51.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 51.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across New Mexico State, Buffalo.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kent State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Buffalo

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

24.5

Efficiency

51.4

Usage

16

Consistency

38.2

Best Game by takeover score

Kent State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 47. Fordham: 57. Liberty: 7. Louisiana: 25. Akron: 8. Central Michigan: 46. Bowling Green: 6. Kent State: 57. Toledo: 13. Ohio: 10. Miami (OH): 14. Eastern Michigan: 4

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 5 by 62.7. Fordham: 6 by 63.3. Liberty: 2 by 23.3. Louisiana: 6 by 27.8. Akron: 2 by 26.7. Central Michigan: 4 by 76.7. Bowling Green: 1 by 40. Kent State: 3 by 100. Toledo: 2 by 43.3. Ohio: 2 by 33.3. Miami (OH): 1 by 93.3. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins37 · Games = 3 · +16.7 vs Losses
Losses20.3 · Games = 9 · -16.7 vs Wins