Player Stats

Marsel McDuffie College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
246
TFL
14.5
Sacks
5
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonUNLV00-0--0-
2022 Regular SeasonUNLV510-0--039.5
2023 PostseasonUNLV117-0--031.7
2023 Regular SeasonUNLV11711.51-2031.7
2024 PostseasonUNLV91320--065.6
2024 Regular SeasonUNLV9335.5214065.6
2025 PostseasonUNLV149-0--064.5
2025 Regular SeasonUNLV141035.5223064.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

UNLV paired 14.5 primary output with 36.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 43.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Utah State

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · UNLV

Games

14

Havoc Plays / G

1.0

Efficiency

43.7

Usage

9.8

Consistency

32.8

Best Game by takeover score

Utah State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 0. Sam Houston: 0. Idaho State: 3. UCLA: 2. Miami (OH): 3. Wyoming: 1. Air Force: 0. Boise State: 0. New Mexico: 1. Colorado State: 1.5. Utah State: 3. Hawai'i: 0. Nevada: 0. Boise State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 9 by 37.5. Sam Houston: 6 by 25. Idaho State: 6 by 55. UCLA: 7 by 49.2. Miami (OH): 10 by 71.7. Wyoming: 4 by 26.7. Air Force: 12 by 50. Boise State: 6 by 25. New Mexico: 11 by 55.8. Colorado State: 8 by 48.3. Utah State: 10 by 71.7. Hawai'i: 8 by 33.3. Nevada: 6 by 25. Boise State: 9 by 37.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.4 · Games = 10 · +1.1 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 4 · -1.1 vs Wins