Player Stats

Brandon Berger College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
59
TFL
13
Sacks
6
QB hurries
10
Passes defended
5
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonBall State00-0--0-
2021 Regular SeasonBall State20-0--033.3
2022 Regular SeasonBall State7102111020.2
2023 Regular SeasonBall State7111.50--012.8
2024 Regular SeasonBall State12389.5594266.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Ball State paired 28.5 primary output with 33.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 33.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kent State

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Ball State

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

2.4

Efficiency

33.6

Usage

11.6

Consistency

37.7

Best Game by takeover score

Kent State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Missouri State: 1. Miami: 1. Central Michigan: 4. James Madison: 0. Western Michigan: 0.5. Kent State: 9. Vanderbilt: 4. Northern Illinois: 3. Miami (OH): 2. Buffalo: 0. Bowling Green: 4. Ohio: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri State: 2 by 18.3. Miami: 2 by 18.3. Central Michigan: 3 by 52.5. James Madison: 4 by 16.7. Western Michigan: 4 by 21.7. Kent State: 4 by 66.7. Vanderbilt: 4 by 56.7. Northern Illinois: 1 by 34.2. Miami (OH): 4 by 36.7. Buffalo: 2 by 8.3. Bowling Green: 3 by 52.5. Ohio: 5 by 20.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins4.3 · Games = 3 · +2.6 vs Losses
Losses1.7 · Games = 9 · -2.6 vs Wins