Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Northern Illinois paired 66 primary output with 58.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Billy Dozier College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 74
- Receptions
- 11
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2021 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 8 | 1 | -3 | 0 | 15.1 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 8 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 15.1 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 9 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 14.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 12 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 49.4 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 12 | 5 | 64 | 0 | 49.4 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 58.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 80th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Northern Illinois
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
5.5
Efficiency
58.7
Usage
9.2
Consistency
8.3
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 2. Boston College: 0. Southern Illinois: 0. Nebraska: 17. Tulsa: 0. Toledo: 24. Akron: 1. Eastern Michigan: 0. Central Michigan: 0. Ball State: 0. Western Michigan: 22. Kent State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 1 by 13.3. Nebraska: 1 by 100. Toledo: 1 by 100. Akron: 1 by 6.7. Western Michigan: 2 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins4.2 · Games = 6 · -2.7 vs Losses
Losses6.8 · Games = 6 · +2.7 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Billy Dozier
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.