Usage Score
16.3
Player Dossier
2020-2023Colorado
WR • 6'3" • 210 lbs • Chandler, AZ, USA
Brenden Rice reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
16.3
Efficiency
89
Consistency
58.9
Season Value
65.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · USC
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brenden Rice, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · USC. Brenden Rice reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
USC paired 791 primary output with 89 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 89 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Colorado, USC.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
65.9
Efficiency
89
Usage
16.3
Consistency
58.9
Best Game by takeover score
UCLA
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nevada: 37. San José State: 12. Stanford: 75. Arizona State: 133. Colorado: 81. Arizona: 96. Notre Dame: 18. Utah: 34. California: 33. Washington: 44. Oregon: 81. UCLA: 147
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nevada: 3 by 82.2. San José State: 1 by 80. Stanford: 1 by 100. Arizona State: 7 by 100. Colorado: 5 by 100. Arizona: 4 by 100. Notre Dame: 2 by 60. Utah: 5 by 45.3. California: 2 by 100. Washington: 2 by 100. Oregon: 5 by 100. UCLA: 8 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCLA
Best efficiency game
100 vs UCLA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/18 | vs UCLA100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-38 | — | 8 | 147 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 1 | 74 |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Oregon | L 27-36 | — | 5 | 81 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Washington | L 42-52 | — | 2 | 44 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ California | W 50-49 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Sun 10/22 | vs Utah | L 32-34 | — | 5 | 34 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Notre Dame | L 20-48 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 11 |
| Sun 10/8 | vs Arizona | W 43-41 | — | 4 | 96 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 53 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Colorado2+ TD | W 48-41 | — | 5 | 81 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 2 | 26 |
| Sun 9/24 | @ Arizona State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 42-28 | — | 7 | 133 | 19 | 19 | 2 | 43 |
| Sun 9/10 | vs Stanford | W 56-10 | — | 1 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Nevada | W 66-14 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Sun 8/27 | vs San José State | W 56-28 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 12 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Colorado
2020-2021
Opening stop
USC
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Colorado | 120 | 71.7 | 8.8 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Colorado | 299 | 58.1 | 17.6 | 179 |
| 2022 Postseason | USC | 611 | 75.6 | 11.4 | 312 |
| 2022 Regular Season | USC | 611 | 75.6 | 11.4 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | USC | 791 | 89 | 16.3 | 180 |
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
147
Primary metric
147 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona State
133
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona
111
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulane
174
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
174 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oregon
102
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · USC
791 primary output · 89 efficiency · 16.3 usage
65.6
#2
2022 Postseason · USC
50.6
611 primary · 75.6 efficiency · 11.4 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · USC
50.6
611 primary · 75.6 efficiency · 11.4 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8987
Hamilton · Chandler, AZ
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,821
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Brenden Rice quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit