Usage Score
17.7
Player Profile
Gunnar Helm
TE • 6'5" • 250 lbs • Englewood, CO, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Gunnar Helm reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.8
Consistency
74.1
Season Value
67.9
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Texas
21222223232424
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Texas
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Texas
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Gunnar Helm, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Texas. Gunnar Helm reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Texas paired 786 primary output with 79.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Texas
Games
16
Receiving Yards / G
49.1
Efficiency
79.8
Usage
17.7
Consistency
74.1
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213141516
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 42. Arizona State: 56. Clemson: 77. Colorado State: 42. Michigan: 98. UTSA: 49. UL Monroe: 8. Mississippi State: 23. Oklahoma: 91. Georgia: 62. Vanderbilt: 46. Florida: 42. Arkansas: 32. Kentucky: 51. Texas A&M: 56. Georgia: 11
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 2 by 100. Arizona State: 3 by 100. Clemson: 6 by 85.6. Colorado State: 2 by 100. Michigan: 7 by 93.3. UTSA: 1 by 100. UL Monroe: 1 by 53.3. Mississippi State: 5 by 30.7. Oklahoma: 5 by 100. Georgia: 6 by 68.9. Vanderbilt: 4 by 76.7. Florida: 3 by 93.3. Arkansas: 3 by 71.1. Kentucky: 5 by 68. Texas A&M: 6 by 62.2. Georgia: 1 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Wins51.6 · n=13 · +13.3 vs Losses
Losses38.3 · n=3 · -13.3 vs Wins
First Half49.4 · n=8 · +0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half48.9 · n=8 · -0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
16 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/11 | vs Ohio State | L 14-28 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 34 |
| Wed 1/1 | @ Arizona State | W 39-31 | — | 3 | 56 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 12/21 | vs Clemson | W 38-24 | — | 6 | 77 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Georgia | L 19-22 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 12/1 | @ Texas A&M | W 17-7 | — | 6 | 56 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Kentucky2+ TD | W 31-14 | — | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 2 | 17 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Arkansas | W 20-10 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Florida | W 49-17 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Vanderbilt | W 27-24 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Georgia | L 15-30 | — | 6 | 62 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Oklahoma | W 34-3 | — | 5 | 91 | 18.2 | 18.20 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Mississippi State | W 35-13 | — | 5 | 23 | 4.6 | 4.60 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/22 | vs UL Monroe | W 51-3 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs UTSA | W 56-7 | — | 1 | 49 | 49 | 49 | 0 | 49 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Michigan | W 31-12 | — | 7 | 98 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Colorado State | W 52-0 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 37 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas
2021-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
2021202220222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Texas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2022 Postseason | Texas | 44 | 55.8 | 5.7 | 44 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas | 44 | 55.8 | 5.7 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Texas | 192 | 72.1 | 7.6 | 148 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas | 192 | 72.1 | 7.6 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas | 786 | 79.8 | 17.7 | 594 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas | 786 | 79.8 | 17.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
98
Primary metric
98 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Oklahoma
67
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Washington
19
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Clemson
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 85.6 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Texas
786 primary output · 79.8 efficiency · 17.7 usage
67.9
#2
2024 Regular Season · Texas
67.9
786 primary · 79.8 efficiency · 17.7 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Texas
36.7
192 primary · 72.1 efficiency · 7.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.8567
McClymonds · Oakland, CA
- Committed To
- San Diego State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,022
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.